FindLaw's Common Law

Legal news you can use from FindLaw.com. Updated each weekday.




May 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

FindLaw Blogs


FindLaw Blotter
Free Enterprise
Injured
Law & Daily Life


If you're looking for information on common law marriage, please visit the Common Law Marriage section on FindLaw.

« FDA Issues Health Warning on Infant Formula from China | Main | FBI: Violent Crimes Down in 2007 »

Court: Virginia Anti-Spam Law Unconstitutional

Virginia's highest court has ruled that a state law prohibiting the mass sending of unsolicited emails ("spam") is an overly broad restriction on free speech, a decision that overturns the criminal conviction of a North Carolina man once known as one of the country's most notorious spammers.

In 2004, Jeremy Jaynes was convicted and sentenced to nine years in prison based on charges that, on three separate occasions, he sent more than 10,000 unsolicted emails to America Online subscribers over a 24-hour period, a violation of the "unsolicited bulk email" provision of the Virginia Computer Crimes Act. On Friday, the Virginia Supreme Court struck down the law, ruling that it is "unconstitutionally overbroad on its face because it prohibits the anonymous transmission of all unsolicited bulk e-mails including those containing political, religious or other speech protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution." The decision reverses Jaynes's conviction, which in 2004 was the first felony spam conviction in the U.S., according to the Washington Post.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451609d69e2010534af3a7a970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Court: Virginia Anti-Spam Law Unconstitutional:



Subscribe



Archives




Common Law Vanguard Panel

The following firms have assisted the FindLaw editorial team in identifying emerging trends in consumer protection law and topics of importance to readers of this blog:


Copyright 2008 FindLaw