FindLaw's Common Law

Legal news you can use from FindLaw.com. Updated each weekday.




February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

FindLaw Blogs


FindLaw Blotter
Free Enterprise
Injured
Law & Daily Life


If you're looking for information on common law marriage, please visit the Common Law Marriage section on FindLaw.

« Tyson Foods to Pay $500,000, Serve Probation for Worker's Death | Main | BART Shooting of Oscar Grant Caught on Video, Family Files $25 Million Claim »

Liskula Cohen Not a Skank? Google Sued Over Anonymous Blog

The New York Daily News reports that Liskula Cohen brought a lawsuit against Google seeking to discover the identity of a blogger who called her a "skank" and an "old hag". With gory details of the blog entitled "Skanks in NYC", the New York Post laid out the online broadside levelled at Cohen, "I would have to say the first-place award for 'Skankiest in NYC' would have to go to Liskula Gentile Cohen," "Anonymous" wrote in one posting, and it just got worse from there.

Liskula Cohen's suit is more specifically directed toward Google's Blogger.com service where the offending material was posted. However, as acknowledged by Cohen's own attorney, it is typically very challenging to identify anonymous posters or bloggers who publish defamatory material. There have been numerous First Amendment cases dealing with these issues, and this particular area of law is constantly and swiftly evolving.

As almost anyone with an email or instant messaging account knows, it is common to communicate using pseudonyms. One of best qualities of the Internet is that people can speak freely and openly without revealing who they really are. However, the flip-side to that coin that sometimes people feel free to post misleading, false, and yes, even insulting material. If someone feels they've been defamed, they can seek to determine the identities of the anonymous parties.

In such cases, courts end up deciding whether the anonymous speaker's identity should be disclosed. As noted in a commentary by FindLaw columnist Eric Sinrod, "because of First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech ... the court normally will err on the side of protecting the identity of the speaker unless the party seeking disclosure can make a "prima facie" showing up front in the case that the speech at issue truly creates liability and that true harm and damage has ensued."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451609d69e2010536b80f56970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Liskula Cohen Not a Skank? Google Sued Over Anonymous Blog:



Subscribe



Archives




Common Law Vanguard Panel

The following firms have assisted the FindLaw editorial team in identifying emerging trends in consumer protection law and topics of importance to readers of this blog:


Copyright 2008 FindLaw